The analysis of the Naudet brother's 1st strike footage.If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice.The Naudet footage is the most publicized 9/11 images and there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak.My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ! ). I wasn't able to perform this analysis earlier as the 4 versions I had of this famous footage were not as good resolution as this 5th version I recently found.We may observe that : NO 'plane' penetration' (gash) appears in the visible right side of the tower until 6 seconds after impact - and the gash is complete only after 15 seconds after impact. In addition, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') has been penciled in digitally to reach the 160ft gash-width required for the perpetrators to 'sell' the idea of a 160ft wide BOEING767 melting entirely into WTC 1.The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET (if anything at all) crashed into the WTC1 - or WTC2 (see SEPTEMBER CLUES). Furthermore, if the most publicized and widespread 9/11 video has been THIS sloppily forged, it appears there were whistleblowers within the forgery crew - or else that crew was quite simply an incompetent bunch.In my honest opinion, the plane/no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law. http://www.livevideo.com/video/social...http://www.youtube.com/simonshack911 no-planery tv fakery 911tvf

Video providers : , and this video is stored with all copyright by